Re: Possible verifier bug

[haklui@xxxxxxxxxx]

The problem has been investigated by our RPG Program Verifier, and
confirmed that it is bug. The problem is inherited from the host compiler
which also shows the same problem when compiling with *NOGEN. I will open
an APAR for this to be fixed in next release.


Hak Lui
AS/400 AD, IBM Canada Ltd.
e-mail: haklui@ca.ibm.com




                    "John Taylor"
                    <jtaylor@rpg2java.       To:     <code400-l@midrange.com>
                    com>                     cc:
                    Sent by:                 Subject:     Re: Possible verifier 
bug
                    code400-l-admin@mi
                    drange.com


                    03/11/02 10:53 AM
                    Please respond to
                    code400-l





Buck,

Thank's for the confirmation.


John Taylor

----- Original Message -----
From: "Buck Calabro" <Buck.Calabro@commsoft.net>
To: <code400-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 8:41 AM
Subject: RE: Possible verifier bug


> >The verifier in V5R1 doesn't flag the following code as a syntax error:
> >
> >C                eval        myProc(someParms)
> >
> >
> >Is this a little bug, or does V5R1 of RPG allow an eval
> >statement without an assignment expression now?
>
> V5R1 SEU allows this but the compiler does not.
> This is the case whether myProc returns a value or not.
>
> This is a bug but I think it's in the iSeries verifier.
>   --buck


_______________________________________________
This is the CODE/400 Discussion & Support (CODE400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: CODE400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/code400-l
or email: CODE400-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/code400-l.