Possible verifier bug -- CODE400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Possible verifier bug
From: "John Taylor" <jtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 12:12:26 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/code400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:code400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: CODE/400 Discussion & Support <code400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:code400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/code400-l>,<mailto:code400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/code400-l>,<mailto:code400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

The verifier in V5R1 doesn't flag the following code as a syntax error:

C                eval        myProc(someParms)


Is this a little bug, or does V5R1 of RPG allow an eval statement without an
assignment expression now?


John Taylor

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.