|
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] I was having some BSOD trouble with Code, but it was the demo version and v4r5, with 98SE. I made the change to Win2k (office) and XP Pro (home) and Code is quite stable. No BSOD's. Not a heavy user of designer nor CPO (use A/CMS) but Editor is solid (except for the highlight bug, and 1 time it lost the last 5000 lines of a 6000 line program). I also made a change to r510 of OS/400 & Code near the same time, and I'm sure that contributed to stability. Win2k for work is the way to go, IMHO. Not just due to Code but even with M$'s own office suites. Tom Westdorp AS/400 Senior Programmer/Analyst IBM Certified Specialist - RPG IV Programmer IBM Certified Specialist - RPG IV Developer Voice: (702) 221-6859 Fax: (702) 221-6881 tom.westdorp@stationcasinos.com <mailto:tom.westdorp@stationcasinos.com> ==> The trouble with hitting the jackpot on a slot machine is that it takes so long to put the money back. -----Original Message----- From: rob@dekko.com [mailto:rob@dekko.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 7:44 AM To: code400-l@midrange.com Subject: RE: Stability horrible in CODE Has there been anyone who's made the migration from 98SE to 2000 who can testify to the stability? Here, we do not run home versions of operating systems (95 and 98) in our business environment. The only exceptions are some poorly purchased laptops. We changed years ago, prior to us adopting Code. Client Access seems to be more stable with the business versions. Now I fully expect someone to argue that no MS product is targeted for business so I'll save you the keystrokes and remark that I don't need that comment now. Snide comments are different from a desire to have Code running on (your favorite operating system of the day). Rob Berendt ================== "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin Scott Mildenberger <Smildenber@Washco To: "'code400-l@midrange.com'" <code400-l@midrange.com> rp.com> cc: Sent by: Fax to: code400-l-admin@mi Subject: RE: Stability horrible in CODE drange.com 10/30/2001 10:18 AM Please respond to code400-l It is very stable on Windows 2000. > -----Original Message----- > From: Wills, Mike N. (TC) [mailto:MNWills@taylorcorp.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 8:26 AM > To: 'code400-l@midrange.com' > Subject: Stability horrible in CODE > > > Is there a reason why CODE/400 seems so unstable? I am > running Windows 98 > SE. On a fairly descent system. > _______________________________________________ > This is the CODE/400 Discussion & Support (CODE400-L) mailing list > To post a message email: CODE400-L@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/code400-l > or email: CODE400-L-request@midrange.com > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/code400-l. > _______________________________________________ This is the CODE/400 Discussion & Support (CODE400-L) mailing list To post a message email: CODE400-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/code400-l or email: CODE400-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/code400-l. _______________________________________________ This is the CODE/400 Discussion & Support (CODE400-L) mailing list To post a message email: CODE400-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/code400-l or email: CODE400-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/code400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.