× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



That's an interesting statement. If it's an ILE program (or module), why would it be difficult to call?

I've only done a couple of C (not C++) programs on IBM i so I can't claim any expertise - just curiosity.

Roger Harman
COMMON Certified Application Developer - ILE RPG on IBM i on Power

--



-----Original Message-----
From: C400-L [mailto:c400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles Wilt
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 9:47 AM
To: Bare Metal Programming IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries)
Subject: Re: [C400-L] ILE C++ standards

That's an option..

Except I want to call the C++ code from RPG...

And while it appears that can be done, it doesn't appear
particularly simple.

Charles

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:25 AM Mark Waterbury <
mark.s.waterbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi, Charles,

If you really need the latest and greatest C++ standards, you should be
looking into installing the GCC G++ compiler under PASE. :-)

All the best,

Mark S. Waterbury

On Friday, July 10, 2020, 12:22:07 PM EDT, Charles Wilt <
charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





"You're surprised by this?"

A little yeah, I expected it to be behind...but 9+ years? :o

No, we don't do much C++, none in fact. But I'd really like to have URI
Templating functionality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL_Template in RPG
and since there were some existing C++, I thought it'd be worthwhile to see
if we could port one over.

Charles


On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 7:35 AM Kelly Beard <kenverybigliar@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

You're surprised by this? :-) Not to sound rude or condescending, but
you, like most everyone else in the universe, probably don't do a lot of
C++ work on the 400. Unfortunately, we do. We're on V7R3 here. IBM is
not even on C++11, technically, but on C++0x, and you have to, for
some reason, enable a command option to get that going. Only God in
Heaven
knows why they cannot stay current. I suspect that maybe the OS is
written
with whatever C++ was in force at the time and so that is what we're
stuck
with, but that's only my uneducated guess.

How many lines is this utility? Probably originally written on a Linux
system with g++?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 5:06 PM Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

So we're trying to port a small C++ utility to ILE...

One of the compile errors is on the following...
for(auto& ele : inVars)

Apparently this the "for each" loop which was added to C++ in
2011...(aka
C++11)

We're on v7.2, but even the v7.4 manual doesn't show it as valid.

Looks like C++ on the IBM i include part of the C+11 standards, but not
yet
all. And of course C++14 and C++17 are nowhere to be found.

Bit surprised the i is so far behind the times, but I suppose most
don't
use ILE C/C++...

Charles


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.