× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Actually - It can happen with any transaction - always when multiple transactions are being processed almost simultaneously.

Contrary to what Al implied - doing a reorg may just cover up the error. For example, when the error is that only half of a T transaction updates the ILI record, you have a chance of seeing that there is a problem if the IWI record is processed correctly. (I'm looking at one of these right now). After a reorg, the IWI record is forced to agree with ILI.

Dick Bailey
MCFA,Inc.


-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+dick.bailey=mcfa.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+dick.bailey=mcfa.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Don Cavaiani
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 9:13 AM
To: BPCS ERP System
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] ITH - Transfer type records

We have noticed that - had no idea where or from what transaction code it was coming from?

-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+dcavaiani=amerequip.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+dcavaiani=amerequip.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bailey, Dick
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:42 AM
To: BPCS ERP System
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] ITH - Transfer type records

Don - Related to Dan's point #2 - there are occasional instances in which transfers do not process totally correctly, and you end up with different balances in ILI from IWI or IIM. Without the ITH reference, it would be tough to figure which is correct. If you haven't experienced this problem, you are either lucky or no one has noticed it.

Dick Bailey
MCFA, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+dick.bailey=mcfa.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+dick.bailey=mcfa.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dan Sweeney
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 7:02 AM
To: BPCS ERP System
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] ITH - Transfer type records

Don,

There might be 2 draw backs to your logic:

1. If your company requires any G/L postings from these transfer types
(T) then there wouldn't be any transactions to fulfill this requirement.

2. When the users are using INV300 and looking at the historical transactions (F21) then, there won't be any transactions in the ITH file to support a balance forward in a particular warehouse and/or lot/location combination. It might be confusing to the users.

When the user presses F/21 for historical transactions the system will read the ITH file starting with the latest transaction sequence in the item master file and then starts reading the transaction history file
(ITH) starting with the number retrieved in the IIM file and then reads backwards.

There aren't any negative impacts on any period end close programs at all.


-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Don Cavaiani
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 7:46 AM
To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [BPCS-L] ITH - Transfer type records


Greetings,

405CD - I am thinking about dropping the writing of records to the ITH file for Transfer Type transactions (they dominate the type of record in our ITH file).

I was wondering if anyone could tell whether or not there would be any "negative" impact on the month-end Cost and/or Accounting close programs
- i.e., any errors which may pop up w/o these trasactions being in the file? I would only stop the writing of the Transfer from/to records to ITH - all other file logic would remain the same (in the transfer program).

Don
Don F. Cavaiani
IT Manager
Amerequip Corp.
920-894-7063

"It's amazing what you can accomplish if you don't care who gets the credit." Harry S. Truman



--
This is the BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list To post a message
email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list To post a message
email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: Dick.Bailey@xxxxxxxx
--
This is the BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list To post a message
email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: dcavaiani@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: Dick.Bailey@xxxxxxxx

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.