Re: Warehouse Allocations -- BPCS-L

Sue:
Not sure if this is for one particular item, or order, or issue is at
the wh level, but 

- make sure location usage on location master is not 0 or 1 (forced or
std which cause allocation logic to check only 1 location per wh/fac or
only 1 location within all wh's for a facility)

- check to see if allocations required flag is set to yes

- these are more specific to orders than issues with in the warehouse,
but orders should not be on any type of hold (cust, credit etc.), should
be priced (look at price source codes), not in use.



Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+richarma=hartcool.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+richarma=hartcool.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Sue Wyatt
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 1:51 PM
To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [BPCS-L] Warehouse Allocations

 We are version 6.04, a couple of weeks ago we had a power 
outage (this may or may not have anything to do with it), and 
every since then our warehouse allocations are not working 
for one of our warehouses.
We have checked the warehouse maintenance which is flagged 
for allocations; we have checked the order maintenance 
records everything looks ok there; we have checked the 
facility planning records which everything looks ok; Item 
Master Maintenance looks ok; the pick release selection 
options in ord 550 look ok; and the warehouse location 
maintenance looks ok. When we put an order in for this 
particular warehouse the allocation does not come out on the 
pick list, nor does it show in the Inv 300 screen. Can anyone 
tell us what we missed or what could possibly be wrong?

Thanks for your help

Susan A. Wyatt
Production Control Coordinator
The Wittern Group
8040 University
Des Moines, IA 50325
515-271-8412
Fax 515-274-5775

SWyatt@xxxxxxxxxxx
Coming together is a beginning, Keeping together is progress, 
Working together is success

-----Original Message-----
From: bpcs-l-bounces+swyatt=wittern.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bpcs-l-bounces+swyatt=wittern.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of bpcs-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 9:58 AM
To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: BPCS-L Digest, Vol 5, Issue 17

Send BPCS-L mailing list submissions to
      bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
      http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
      bpcs-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
      bpcs-l-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more 
specific than
"Re: Contents of BPCS-L digest..."

*** NOTE: When replying to this digest message, PLEASE remove 
all text unrelated to your reply and change the subject line 
so it is meaningful.

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Delivery to 1 time customer / End-user (Arthur Shaffer)
   2. Re: Delivery to 1 time customer / End-user (Peter Heeren)
   3. Re: PO Actual Cost (daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
   4. Re: PO Actual Cost (Dan Sweeney)
   5. Re: PO Actual Cost (daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

message: 1
date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 04:13:32 -0800 (PST)
from: Arthur Shaffer <abshaffer@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [BPCS-L] Delivery to 1 time customer / End-user

Peter,
Who is paying for the parts?
If it the end customer, I would think you would want the 
customer setup for A/R.
If not, set up one customer "Spare Parts". Overide the 
address at order entry time to be the address for end 
customer where you are sending the parts.

Art

----- Original Message ----
From: Peter Heeren <pheeren@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 6:23:25 AM
Subject: [BPCS-L] Delivery to 1 time customer / End-user

Hello BPCS midrange group members,

Our main customers are OEM and Wholesalers. 
We have setup the master records (customer master, Ship-to 
addresses, pricing, etc) for the order/shipping process. 
We are using BPCS 8.2

We are now facing a new challenge for our customer service department.
They have to deliver spare parts to the end-user of our products. 
An end user can be compared with a one-time customer, for 
which we don't want to set up a customer master, ship to 
address etc...

Has anyone of you solved this within the standard BPCS functionality?
If not, what 'BPCS interfaced ' partner products are you using?

Kind regards,

Peter Heeren

Please note: This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.
Please notify us immediately if you are not the intended 
recipient. You should not copy it, forward it or use it for 
any purpose or disclose the contents to any person.
For details of our international offices please visit our website: 
http://www.thetford.eu
Thetford B.V. is statutorily based in Etten-Leur, 
Netherlands. Chamber of Commerce West-Brabant registration 
number 20037470.

___________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact Thetford: +31 
(0)76-504.23.49 
___________________________________________________________________
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list To 
post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, 
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives 
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: abshaffer@xxxxxxxxx

------------------------------

message: 2
date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:04:33 +0100
from: Peter Heeren <pheeren@xxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [BPCS-L] Delivery to 1 time customer / End-user

We are already 'mis-using' a standard customer as mentioned 
in your mail for free deliveries of service parts and 
override the address in order entry or create a ship to address.

When the end user has to pay, we need to set up the ACR customer.
ACR is owned by our accounting department, while order entry 
for these parts is done bij our customer service desk. 
In this case we need to involve 2 departments for s simple 
1-time delivery.
I was hoping there was a quicker work around.

I was hoping there was an quicker work around.

regards,

Peter

Arthur Shaffer <abshaffer@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bpcs-l-bounces+pheeren=thetford.nl@xxxxxxxxxxxx
19-01-2007 13:23
Please respond to
SSA's BPCS ERP System <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

To
"SSA's BPCS ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc

Subject
Re: [BPCS-L] Delivery to 1 time customer / End-user

Peter,
Who is paying for the parts?
If it the end customer, I would think you would want the 
customer setup for A/R.
If not, set up one customer "Spare Parts". Overide the 
address at order entry time to be the address for end 
customer where you are sending the parts.

Art

----- Original Message ----
From: Peter Heeren <pheeren@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 6:23:25 AM
Subject: [BPCS-L] Delivery to 1 time customer / End-user

Hello BPCS midrange group members,

Our main customers are OEM and Wholesalers. 
We have setup the master records (customer master, Ship-to 
addresses, pricing, etc) for the order/shipping process. 
We are using BPCS 8.2

We are now facing a new challenge for our customer service department.
They have to deliver spare parts to the end-user of our products. 
An end user can be compared with a one-time customer, for 
which we don't

want to set up a customer master, ship to address etc...

Has anyone of you solved this within the standard BPCS functionality?
If not, what 'BPCS interfaced ' partner products are you using?

Kind regards,

Peter Heeren

Please note: This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.
Please notify us immediately if you are not the intended 
recipient. You should not copy it, forward it or use it for 
any purpose or disclose the

contents to any person.
For details of our international offices please visit our website: 
http://www.thetford.eu
Thetford B.V. is statutorily based in Etten-Leur, 
Netherlands. Chamber of Commerce West-Brabant registration 
number 20037470.

___________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact Thetford: +31 (0)76-504.23.49
___________________________________________________________________
-- 
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: abshaffer@xxxxxxxxx

-- 
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: pheeren@xxxxxxxxxxx

___________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact Thetford: +31 (0)76-504.23.49
___________________________________________________________________

Please note: This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged.
Please notify us immediately if you are not the intended 
recipient. You 
should not copy it, forward it or use it for any purpose or 
disclose the

contents to any person.
For details of our international offices please visit our website: 
http://www.thetford.eu
Thetford B.V. is statutorily based in Etten-Leur, Netherlands. Chamber
of 
Commerce West-Brabant registration number 20037470.

___________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact Thetford: +31 (0)76-504.23.49
___________________________________________________________________

------------------------------

message: 3
date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:59:46 -0500
from: daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost

Thanks guys.  The term "expected cost" sounds familiar but if I have
ever 
delt with it before it's been long enough that the storage in 
that part
of 
my brain has already been reclaimed.  :)  Dan's answer brings 
up another

question--what does PPV stand for?

Still, my original question wasn't about the expected cost 
field, it was

about the actual cost in PACST.  Is that field the total cost 
from all 
receipts against that line, the cost of the last receipt against that 
line, or something else?  To me it looks like the total but then we
don't 
typically have multiple receipts against a single line but 
that's not to

say that it never happens.

Dave Parnin
-- 
Nishikawa Standard Company
Topeka, IN  46571
daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Dan Sweeney" <dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bpcs-l-bounces+daparnin=niscoseals.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
01/18/2007 07:53 PM
Please respond to SSA's BPCS ERP System

        To:     "SSA's BPCS ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "SSA's
BPCS 
ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost

Your findings are truw:

Withn the G/L the U transactions will post the std cost that is on the
PO 
at the time the PO was entered  and will affect the Inventory asset 
account and accrued liability.

When the PO is costed by AP the C transaction posts the 
actual cost from

the AP invoice and measures the PPV against the std cost on the PO vs.
the 
actual cost on the AP invoice.

The expected cost will default into the AP invoice.

The actual cost from the AP invoice is a global cost and is not a
facility 
cost.

________________________________

From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
on behalf of

macwheel99@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu 1/18/2007 5:46 PM
To: SSA's BPCS ERP System
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost

We recently had a similar confusion on 405 CD & it turns out
that while the rest of BPCS has standard cost, actual cost,
frozen cost, etc. the Purchase Order application has another
cost not found any place else = EXPECTED COST.

What happens is, when the PO is first created, the expected
cost field is a copy of the standard cost, then after the
vendor confirms our PO with the delivery date, pricing etc.
our Purchasing people update the PO with that info.  The new
cost goes into the EXPECTED COST, which is what we expect the
actual cost to be.

This impacts a lot of purchasing reports and transactions.
Right now we are trying to reconcile the General Ledger
account where "U" transaction adds value when the inventory
arrives in house, and the "C" transaction when ACP keys in
the vendor invoice.  In theory the only money in that account
should be the value of raw materials that arrived, but not
yet the invoices.  Reality is a different story.

Also, our SYS800 rules say that everything is to go into BPCS
based on LAST STANDARD COST, but we have found out that some
purchase order transactions go in as LAST ACTUAL COST.

---- Original message ----

This is a question about a field in the HPO file.  We are on

version 4.02.

There is a field PACST  (Actual Cost Total (global)).  Is

this the total

cost of the quantity received so far for that line?

Ultimately, I'm want

the last invoiced piece price for a query but didn't know if

the user

would be satisfied with an "average" price.  That's what it

looks like is

here but I wanted to confirm it.  Thanks.


Dave Parnin
--
Nishikawa Standard Company
Topeka, IN  46571
daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: macwheel99@xxxxxxxxxxx

--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


------------------------------

message: 4
date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:05:33 -0500
from: "Dan Sweeney" <dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost

Dave,
 
PPV = Purchase Price Variance

________________________________

From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
on behalf of
daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri 1/19/2007 9:59 AM
To: SSA's BPCS ERP System
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost



Thanks guys.  The term "expected cost" sounds familiar but if I have
ever
delt with it before it's been long enough that the storage in 
that part
of
my brain has already been reclaimed.  :)  Dan's answer brings 
up another
question--what does PPV stand for?

Still, my original question wasn't about the expected cost 
field, it was
about the actual cost in PACST.  Is that field the total cost from all
receipts against that line, the cost of the last receipt against that
line, or something else?  To me it looks like the total but then we
don't
typically have multiple receipts against a single line but 
that's not to
say that it never happens.


Dave Parnin
--
Nishikawa Standard Company
Topeka, IN  46571
daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx






"Dan Sweeney" <dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bpcs-l-bounces+daparnin=niscoseals.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
01/18/2007 07:53 PM
Please respond to SSA's BPCS ERP System

        To:     "SSA's BPCS ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "SSA's
BPCS
ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        cc:
        Subject:        Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost


Your findings are truw:

Withn the G/L the U transactions will post the std cost that is on the
PO
at the time the PO was entered  and will affect the Inventory asset
account and accrued liability.

When the PO is costed by AP the C transaction posts the 
actual cost from
the AP invoice and measures the PPV against the std cost on the PO vs.
the
actual cost on the AP invoice.

The expected cost will default into the AP invoice.

The actual cost from the AP invoice is a global cost and is not a
facility
cost.

________________________________

From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
on behalf of
macwheel99@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu 1/18/2007 5:46 PM
To: SSA's BPCS ERP System
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost



We recently had a similar confusion on 405 CD & it turns out
that while the rest of BPCS has standard cost, actual cost,
frozen cost, etc. the Purchase Order application has another
cost not found any place else = EXPECTED COST.

What happens is, when the PO is first created, the expected
cost field is a copy of the standard cost, then after the
vendor confirms our PO with the delivery date, pricing etc.
our Purchasing people update the PO with that info.  The new
cost goes into the EXPECTED COST, which is what we expect the
actual cost to be.

This impacts a lot of purchasing reports and transactions.
Right now we are trying to reconcile the General Ledger
account where "U" transaction adds value when the inventory
arrives in house, and the "C" transaction when ACP keys in
the vendor invoice.  In theory the only money in that account
should be the value of raw materials that arrived, but not
yet the invoices.  Reality is a different story.

Also, our SYS800 rules say that everything is to go into BPCS
based on LAST STANDARD COST, but we have found out that some
purchase order transactions go in as LAST ACTUAL COST.

---- Original message ----

This is a question about a field in the HPO file.  We are on

version 4.02.

There is a field PACST  (Actual Cost Total (global)).  Is

this the total

cost of the quantity received so far for that line?

Ultimately, I'm want

the last invoiced piece price for a query but didn't know if

the user

would be satisfied with an "average" price.  That's what it

looks like is

here but I wanted to confirm it.  Thanks.


Dave Parnin
--
Nishikawa Standard Company
Topeka, IN  46571
daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: macwheel99@xxxxxxxxxxx

--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




------------------------------

message: 5
date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:57:33 -0500
from: daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost

That makes sense.  It's been a long week and my brain is only on half 
power today.







"Dan Sweeney" <dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bpcs-l-bounces+daparnin=niscoseals.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
01/19/2007 10:05 AM
Please respond to SSA's BPCS ERP System
 
        To:     "SSA's BPCS ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "SSA's
BPCS 
ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost


Dave,

PPV = Purchase Price Variance

________________________________

From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
on behalf of

daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri 1/19/2007 9:59 AM
To: SSA's BPCS ERP System
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost



Thanks guys.  The term "expected cost" sounds familiar but if I have
ever
delt with it before it's been long enough that the storage in 
that part
of
my brain has already been reclaimed.  :)  Dan's answer brings 
up another
question--what does PPV stand for?

Still, my original question wasn't about the expected cost 
field, it was
about the actual cost in PACST.  Is that field the total cost from all
receipts against that line, the cost of the last receipt against that
line, or something else?  To me it looks like the total but then we
don't
typically have multiple receipts against a single line but 
that's not to
say that it never happens.


Dave Parnin
--
Nishikawa Standard Company
Topeka, IN  46571
daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx






"Dan Sweeney" <dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bpcs-l-bounces+daparnin=niscoseals.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
01/18/2007 07:53 PM
Please respond to SSA's BPCS ERP System

To:     "SSA's BPCS ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "SSA's BPCS
ERP System" <bpcs-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject:        Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost


Your findings are truw:

Withn the G/L the U transactions will post the std cost that is on the
PO
at the time the PO was entered  and will affect the Inventory asset
account and accrued liability.

When the PO is costed by AP the C transaction posts the 
actual cost from
the AP invoice and measures the PPV against the std cost on the PO vs.
the
actual cost on the AP invoice.

The expected cost will default into the AP invoice.

The actual cost from the AP invoice is a global cost and is not a
facility
cost.

________________________________

From: bpcs-l-bounces+dsweeney=phoenixbcinc.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
on behalf of
macwheel99@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu 1/18/2007 5:46 PM
To: SSA's BPCS ERP System
Subject: Re: [BPCS-L] PO Actual Cost



We recently had a similar confusion on 405 CD & it turns out
that while the rest of BPCS has standard cost, actual cost,
frozen cost, etc. the Purchase Order application has another
cost not found any place else = EXPECTED COST.

What happens is, when the PO is first created, the expected
cost field is a copy of the standard cost, then after the
vendor confirms our PO with the delivery date, pricing etc.
our Purchasing people update the PO with that info.  The new
cost goes into the EXPECTED COST, which is what we expect the
actual cost to be.

This impacts a lot of purchasing reports and transactions.
Right now we are trying to reconcile the General Ledger
account where "U" transaction adds value when the inventory
arrives in house, and the "C" transaction when ACP keys in
the vendor invoice.  In theory the only money in that account
should be the value of raw materials that arrived, but not
yet the invoices.  Reality is a different story.

Also, our SYS800 rules say that everything is to go into BPCS
based on LAST STANDARD COST, but we have found out that some
purchase order transactions go in as LAST ACTUAL COST.

---- Original message ----

This is a question about a field in the HPO file.  We are on

version 4.02.

There is a field PACST  (Actual Cost Total (global)).  Is

this the total

cost of the quantity received so far for that line?

Ultimately, I'm want

the last invoiced piece price for a query but didn't know if

the user

would be satisfied with an "average" price.  That's what it

looks like is

here but I wanted to confirm it.  Thanks.


Dave Parnin
--
Nishikawa Standard Company
Topeka, IN  46571
daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: macwheel99@xxxxxxxxxxx

--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: dsweeney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


--
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: daparnin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


------------------------------

-- 
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) digest list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.



End of BPCS-L Digest, Vol 5, Issue 17
*************************************

______________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned by Managed Email Content Service, using
Skeptic(tm) technology powered by MessageLabs.
______________________________________________________________________

-- 
This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: BPCS-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/bpcs-l
or email: BPCS-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.

Delivered-To: richarma@xxxxxxxxxxxx