|
Albert, It seams that the EDI transactions you would like to exchange are pure orders that you want to have integrated in COM / ORD. You can do with standard ECM adapters. RMS is not required in that case. If you plan to use mainly EDIFACT transactions, we already have a fully integrated EDI solution with BPCS V6 and V8 on the shelf. This product ECS/EIP is available for the EDI translators TLE/400 (the old SSA EDISOL/EDISET product), TLA for AS/400 (EDI/400 - TrustedLink product from Harbinger/Peregrine) and very soon with our own ECS/integrated email module ECS/EDI. It includes messages like ORDERS, INVOICES, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, DISPATCH ADVISES, and others, for EDIFACT, TRADACOMS and EAN alike standards. We can also provide professional services to implemented very quickly this solution, as we have knowledge of the Spanish EDI market, and we have Spanish speaking EDI / ECM consultants available. If you require more information, or if you want me to contact you directly, let me know off-line. Ben Rinkel ECS International B.V. Ph. +31 229 574331 Mob. +31 6 5317 4449 www.ecs-europe.com Hi folks, BPCS v6.1.01. My question is whether is possible to implement the ECM module ( EDI ) with out using RMS, using standard ORD and BIL for the supply chain cycle. I do not know RMS, so I wonder if there is many difficulties if we receipt customer orders via EDI and fill up ECH/ECL files and process the orders in the standard ORD distribution cycle. Many thanks in advance. Albert
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.