Re: Performance Issues

[Glenn Ericson <Glenn-Ericson@xxxxxxx>]

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Jason
If  anything I'd be turning the crank up on batch for this type
environment. If you left  batch the same and upped Interactive  the  net is
less for batch then before though I  doubt that likely on an upgrade.


  jason.schemmel@glbsoft.com wrote:
>I have a question for anyone regarding the BPCS Client/Server Modules.  We
>just
>upgraded our AS/400 to a model 820.  We upgraded our feature card to allow
>for more interactive processing (CPW I=240, B=950).  We also converted our
>client server communications from token-ring to TCP/IP.  Ever since we did
>this, we have been experiencing periods of unacceptable response time from
>both Load Control and the General Ledger.  We will receive TCP/IP time out
>messages in the C/S modules.  Some of the screens will take upwards of 10
>minutes to change.  Looking at the performance data being captured on the
>400, it does not appear to be an AS/400 horsepower issue.
>Is it possible that there is a fix from SSA to improve the
>performance of the C/S modules?  We are running version 6.0.04 of BPCS in
>case this makes a difference :)
>
>I would greatly appreciate any help that you may be able to offer in
>resolving this problem.
>
>GB
>_______________________________________________
>This is the SSA's BPCS ERP System (BPCS-L) mailing list
>To post a message email: BPCS-L@midrange.com
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/bpcs-l
>or email: BPCS-L-request@midrange.com
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/bpcs-l.
--