|
We are on 405 CD This has been a moving target for us due to turn-over of personnel, and what is considered important by different people. There are people who understand the policy & do not change things without proper authorization. There are people who see no harm in changing anything they can get access to. We have experienced people we can trust to be maintaining these fields, and to know when they mess something up such as by keystroke error, so that recovery is possible. We have other people who can field exit by accident through other fields and not realize that they have done that. I have suggested that we consider clones of the maintenance programs such that the only fields with allowed access would be the cluster relevant to a particular department's responsibilities such as the cost fields, the planning fields, the lead time fields, the fields we use to track factory floor machines molds applicators. I have suggested a modification to the security logic in that when the program says "Oh Yes so & so is authorized to be running THIS program" that it add to some history showing a list of the people who actually are running what update programs. This would be similar to the count of inventory transactions by person by type for a month so we can see standard patterns vs. exceptions. Various departments have released charts of default standard values to be used when entering new items relevant to their responsibilities, but this is sometimes based on certain understandings that could be mistaken, then the data used by someone else inappropriately, so periodic review of the rules being used & where the data came from is wise. We have an "engineering department" which does the actual maintenance of 99% of the stuff in item master, BOM, routings, cost files. I personnally do periodic repairs of corrupted data & blanket inserts of requested defaults, when we start using some field for first time. Our purchasing department maintains costs on raw materials & parts that are made in one facility for usage in another. We have a number of people who are supposed to maintain specific types of items or specific fields, but mistakes happen. We have some queries that list discrepancies in our data to help us fix them. But we are drowning in such specialized queries. I did start work on a compendium program to try to list ALL discrepancies regardless of file, with the intent of it being a check list of fixes needed, but the volume so big that I have been using it to prioritize what to fix. People & departments get authorized to change things & then management loses track of who all involved & how you can track that, so that people who are held accountable for the accuracy of various files have no say in who else is changing their stuff. I created some reports off of the security files to chart who all is authorized to run various things & we find for example that fully 1/2 of our employees can change just about anything. At one point we had a problem with some unknown person changing General Ledger stuff, so I made that a file that logs who is into it with what program & I monitored it for a while but the only access was totally authorized. MacWheel99@aol.com (Alister Wm Macintyre) (Al Mac) BPCS 405 CD Manager / Programmer @ Global Wire Technologies Incorporated http://www.globalwiretechnologies.com = new name same quality wire engineering company: fax # 812-424-6838 From: dcerrai@flo.boehringer-ingelheim.com Dear Colleague we have used BPCS since 1994, and this has requested the creation of a specific company-wide function "ITEM MASTER", as you already did. This is particularly necessary if your company works in a "regulated" environment (such as the Pharmaceautical). It is impossible to divide responsibilities on Items, BOMs,... Probably, using the new E-Signature & E-Security modules you could manage otherwise. Best Regards David Cerrai (Boehringer Ingelheim Italy, IS Business Support Manager for Supply and Support Chains) -----Original Message----- From: Zzbpcs@aol.com [mailto:Zzbpcs@aol.com] Good Day Although we are on Release 4.05 CD, the question is a generic MRP II question: Which department(s) has ownership over the Item Master File ? With BPCS, many different departments have a vested interest in the accuracy of specific fields. How does YOUR organization handle who does the actual Maintenance of the Item Master, Bills of Material, Routings, ...... We circulate a " Form " to various departments so that they manually write down the values of "their" fields. Eventually, the form gets to the desk of one person who actually keys the data into BPCS. "Sometimes" this takes longer than we wish !! Thanks, Jim Barry Belchertown Mass
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.