Re: INV903 6.1.01 Resequencing

[MacWheel99@xxxxxxx]

Did you check sequence #s vs. transaction dates BEFORE INV9 end month
ie. to confirm the mess you now see was not there all along?

It is a common misconception that sequence #s are supposed to match 
transaction dates.  In a testing environment you may have people deliberately 
doing same transactions using a diversity of dates to verify Y2K compliance, 
so that you would reasonably expect dates all over the map with adjacent 
sequence numbers.

>  From:    GlassD@CBFLEET.COM (Debra Glass)
>  
>  > Has anyone successfully run INV903 - Inventory Month End Close in 6.1.01
>  > where inventory IS lot controlled and records ARE deleted and
>  > resequenced??  
>  > 
>  > We have just tested this and have a mess!  The sequence #s definitely do
>  > not follow the transaction date.  It looks to me like the resequencing
>  > program has been heavily rewritten from the 6.02 version.  I have checked
>  > and we did not have duplicate sequence #s.
>  > 
>  Thanks, 
>  Debra 

MacWheel99@aol.com (Alister Wm Macintyre) (Al Mac)
AS/400 Data Manager & Programmer for BPCS 405 CD Rel-02 mixed mode 

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---