× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. BPCS-L
  3. November 2000

RE: Performance

I don't wanna seem TOO stupid...but fat client/thin client?  The branch of
the company we're experiencing this is on V6.1.01 (new conversion - like a
couple of weeks).  On 6.1 they didn't have this performance hit...and
they're running mixed-mode...

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of bbenton@ssax.com
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 2:35 PM
To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
Subject: Re: Performance


I recall these parameters controlling line validation in the 6.004 (fat
Client)
COM.  With the 6.100 thin client COM, they do not impact order entry
performance.

Bob Benton
SSA Global Technologies
Business Consultant
312-474-7381




"Rob Stagis" <stagis@fansteelvrwesson.com> on 11/30/2000 10:29:34 AM

Please respond to BPCS-L@midrange.com

To:   BPCS-L@midrange.com
cc:    (bcc: BOB BENTON/SSA/US)
Subject:  Performance



BPCS V6.1.01, OS/400 V4R4 current cum packs, I guess.

To all:  On panel ORD820D-06 (Order Parameters) - how do the parallel
validation and posting parameters affect system performance?  I'm still
having issues with this box.  If a user posts a large (like 25 line) order
or a couple users are trying to post orders at the same time, the WRKSYSSTS
display will show act-to-wait numbers that can range over 100,000.  With the
system usually running around 50-100 in that column, it's quite shocking to
watch it 'burp' that high.  I have a commensurate lag in performance during
the time the orders are posting.

With the configurator CFG640B and Order Post ORD701B programs being
submitted to  a job queue that feeds QINTER, I can all of a sudden show a
dozen or more CFG640B's and ORD701B's either in an active or LCKW state.
What do I do?

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of Devin Bowen
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 10:41 PM
To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
Subject: RE: Converting from 4.05 CD to 6.1.01


all net change docs for your task are on OGS online.  you will need to get
docs for 6.0.02, 6.0.02 to 6.0.04, 6.0.04 to 6.1 (sounds like you have this
one).  code tables are kept in ZCC.  most will be hard to populate
intelligently until you do analysis on what has changed in terms of how you
will use the new BPCS (this knowledge will likely come out of your
prototyping and conference room pilot of eBPCS).  Think of it as a new ERP
implementation with easily converted data and you'll do fine.

Devin

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of Roger.Henady@thorco.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 1:44 PM
To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
Subject: Converting from 4.05 CD to 6.1.01



Does anyone know of a list of new fields / files since 4.05 that are
required to be populated?

With the 6.1 CD Doc., there was a net change spread sheet listing the new
fields between 6.04 and 6.1.


There is also a CODE MASTER TABLE maintenance.    Do you know what files
this is updating?   We thought we could write programs to populate these
files.    EX.    planning codes,  country codes, routes, etc........


Thanks for your help

Roger





+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---



+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.