RE: Performance

["Rob Stagis" <stagis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

And I'd LOVE to send these off into their own subsystem....I have no problem
setting up a separate subsystem and job queue for 'em, but don't know how to
tell BPCS to do it.  The weird part is that with a *nomax parameter on
QINTER, the dang thing is blowing in all these jobs and they start locking
on each other.  It grunts quite terrifically.

The BPCS parameters that control 'parallel posting' and 'parallel
validation' seem to be talking about this, but I don't know their effect.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com]On
Behalf Of dslessman@nationalelectrical.com
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 12:14 PM
To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
Subject: Re: Performance



"With the configurator CFG640B and Order Post ORD701B programs being
submitted to  a job queue that feeds QINTER, I can all of a sudden show a
dozen or more CFG640B's and ORD701B's either in an active or LCKW state.
What do I do?"

Why are you feeding subsystem QINTER with batch type jobs.  Batch jobs and
interactive jobs should normally be in seperate pools.  Have you tried
setting
up a multi-threaded subsystem description just for the configurator and
order
post jobs?

Just a thought.

Regards,

Dwight



+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---