|
from Al Mac In another life, eons ago, I did a modification to do something like this. It was BPCS/36 before SSA had invented facilities. To keep MRP divorced we had to have separate data bases - like today's environments, one per facility. We had the same bank account for each type of check - A/P, Payroll, etc. irrespective of facility paying the checks & there was a reconciliation problem. I suggested a different color checks & different number series for each facility, but accounting wanted each data base to be ready to run checks, then print one set right after another, continuously, then at reconciliation time, simplify matching up which checks with which facilities. At the time it was internally defined files, easy to add fields. I selected one file in one facility to keep track of last used check & planted a high order digit representing which facility was writing the checks, so a check run might be 501234-501305 for facility 5, followed by 301306-301459 for facility 3, followed by 401460-401622 for facility 4. If you strip off the facility # in front, the check #s are contiguous. If I was doing something like this today, with externally defined files, I would probably add an extra file outside of the BPCS collection, just to keep track of this. This kind of modification makes an enormous amount of sense when you consider occasional hassles wih printer jams or human klutz. On BPCS 405 what happens is you tell it the next check number to print & it records the check # corresponding to the data being printed on the check & woe betide you if the printer operator messes up. The reason we returned to vanilla BPCS on this thing is because when we converted BPCS/36 to BPCS 405 CD, there were thousands of modifications that we lost, and other ones had higher priority to reconstitute. Alister William Macintyre > Date: 10/19/2000 3:23:23 PM Central Daylight Time > From: MCINTOSH@rcmint.ca (McIntosh, Janet) > > We are in the process of implementing BPCS 6.1.01 on the AS/400 and have > questions about the Check printing process. > The process as far as we can see requires that you have prenumbered check > stock, and once the checks have physically printed, you inform the system of > the numbers you used. > > Has anyone out there implemented BPCS AP and been able to produce and print > checks on un-numbered check stock, having BPCS print the check numbers > based on the next available check number from the Bank Account Master file. > > > Thanks in advance for any ideas anyone has... > > Janet McIntosh > Royal Canadian Mint +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.