|
Listen - SSA has never kept someone from getting a permanent key to software they have a right to and they do not intend to start. If a key has been withheld it was withheld for valid reasons, i.e. software not paid for, movement from one box to another with old tier pricing etc.... However to address the specific issue being given as and example, if you are moving from a Cisc to Risc machine and have let OGS expire there is a charge for that. It took time and effort on SSA's part to test moving BPCS from CISC to RISC. If you have not kept current on OGS then you have no right to run BPCS on the RISC Machine. OGS is what pays for moving the software forward. SSA Global Technologies can not give things away. R & D is expensive, if we give away their efforts, we'll end up right where we were as SSA. I don't think any of us wants that. If you have a specific issue, contact me directly, not through this list, and I will get you in touch with the appropriate SSA GT personnel. "Bill" <brobins3d@yahoo.com> on 10/11/2000 01:05:24 PM Please respond to BPCS-L@midrange.com To: BPCS-L@midrange.com cc: (bcc: Kari Miller/SSA/US) Subject: Re: Is it possible to crack the BPCS Key logic? Elsberry, > Breaking a software key logic is a 'moral' issue. No it's not, not on it's own. Breaking the logic in order to get something not paid for would be. > Stealing, no matter what the motive, is still stealing. Agreed. But we haven't been talking about stealing have we? We've been talking about overriding the security check. > In the 10 years that I have worked with SSA, > and 5 for them, I have never seen them be so unreasonable as to deny a > permanent key to someone just because they won't pay on-going support for a > non-supported older version. Do you still have contacts there? Call them up and ask them their current standing on this issue, and make sure you talk to the holders of the keys. If by chance you get the answer that goes against what I have proposed, ask them if they ever held that stance this year. If they reply it has never been their policy to withhold the key, then they are lying. If they reply that their current policy is as I have represented it, what is your stance then? > If you have to rationalize why you're doing something like this, it is > probably to appease your own conscience and not to support some flimzy > business reason. Hmm, I would think being unable to operate software that was legally licensed would not be a flimzy business reason; maybe your business is different. Bill _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +--- +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.