|
Ian, In a message dated 9/15/00 8:26:21 AM Eastern Daylight Time, ian.bunn@progeny400.com writes: > You'd think that after 10 years AS/SET would be a more stable product > generating far more efficient code. I personally think that the reliance on > this product was a contributory factor of the decline of SSA - it simply > didn't improve the BPCS product and did not improve application development > times especially when using the BPCS shell program. In the early days, I > remember going in an physically fixing the subfile routines :-( ... somebody > pass me my pipe and slippers! How true! They chose the tool for BPCS, and then immediately took AS/Set off of the open market which meant that only SSA, preexisting AS/Set owners, and catastrophic bug fixes (in that order, read the latter as "litigable") drove the improvement of AS/Set. Not that improvements were _that_ forthcoming beforehand. I worked for an AS/Set resale partner starting at version 2.0. Said partner dropped Synon because AS/Set was a better product at the time! In the years we sold the product, the only major improvements made were fixing the problem with the generator blowing up (four years after it started), International Keyboard Support (remove the @ sign from the front of commands), DBCS support (don't remember asking for that one, or any of the others for that matter), and Y2K compliance for the date routines. The thing still generates V1R2 code, incorrectly parses SQL statements (and does so by completely stopping code generation), and continues to generate nonsensical NAARGx code for its functions. HOWEVER, if you know how to use it properly, it _CAN_ be used to generate more solid code than you could in the same timeframe by hand. Unfortunately, few (including SSA) know _HOW_ to use it properly. Also unfortunately, simple changes could have made this a _GREAT_ product. A "killer app". I've often wished to have a copy of the source code to AS/Set for just six months... > I know that there are a number of companies and houses out there who have > used AS/SET to develop extras to your BPCS suite and for mods, the use of > this product was necessary but I certainly am one of many people who will be > glad to see the back of it. You're certainly not the only one. I count myself among them, although I would not had even a minimal effort toward the improvement of AS/Set been attempted... Regards! Dean Asmussen Enterprise Systems Consulting, Inc. Fuquay-Varina, NC USA E-mail: DAsmussen@aol.com "Anyone who is not liberal in their youth has no heart. Anyone who is not conservative in their adulthood has no brain." -- Winston Churchill +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.