Re: Duplicated costs

["Chick Doe" <Cdoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

let me add even more amazement! as of april/may 2000 i have found two more 
problems with cst500/600 and ssa is working to develop bmrs's for them. we are 
on v6.04 with all of the cum's applied. so much for a stable product!

chick doe
barton instrument systems

>>> MAndreen1@aol.com 07/08/00 09:01AM >>>
Jesus Maynez:

    I am an independent consultant who worked at a site in northern
Virginia in April of 1999 on various cost roll up problems within version
6.0.04. At that time I had daily contact with SSA help line. In 1999, SSA
did not provide a 6.0.04 CUM . However, Chicago SSA was indeed
very helpful and responsive to my cost roll up concerns. To my amazement
there were over 25 BMRs to CST500 and CST600. Your last e-mail did not
state if you have applied SSA Chicago's 6.0.04 CUM or not. If you
have program modifications that prevent applying this CUM then consider 
requesting these CST500 and CST600 Beamers and verifying their 
effectiveness in a test environment. If you have applied the 6.0.04 CUM then
please disregard this e-mail.             have  a  good  day

Curt Andreen
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com 
+---

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---