× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Purchase Receipts Procedure
  • From: "Peggy A. Heritz" <pheritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:35:42 -0500



As usual, first a summary of the BPCS functions being discussed:

 The "N" transaction receives inventory to "inspection", "P" is then used to
transfer material from inspection to stock.  The "N" transaction does NOT update
inventory status in any way, nor update  the PO qty received.  An "N" does
update the PO status is updated to indicate that material is in inspection.
The "P" transaction updates the PO qty received and BPCS inventory.   Until the
"P" transaction is performed, the material in inspection is only visible via the
Inspection Dispatch report.  The inventory is NOT visible via INV300.

Now my comments:

Talk to your Accounting folks before implementing the "receipt to inspection"
function with the "N" and "P" transactions.  In the US, when you physically take
possession of the inventory & sign the paperwork at the dock, you own it and are
liable for it.   Regardless of inspection activities.   This is a conflict with
the "N" functionality.  Since "N" neither updates inventory no PO receipts, it
is difficult to account for all accrued liabilities at EOM.    Also, at physical
inventory time, you must be very careful to not count anything that is in the
"in inspection" status.  This inventory is not on-hand from a BPCS standpoint.

Instead of using the "in inspection" functionality, I recommend receiving
everything with a "U" transaction.  If you need to inspect certain materials,
receive them to an "INSP" location that is non-allocatable.   The materials that
pass inspection get transferred to the floor or a stock location.  Materials
that don't pass,  follow the vendor return process.      Plenty of transactions
for audit trails & quality reason codes, etc.

Peggy Heritz, Executive
Crowe Chizek & Company, LLP
http://www.crowechizek.com/scg/
219.236.8698


+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.