|
I respect the opinions of all who have responded to my posting and thank them, but I have to ask - Why do we keep talking about doing re-orgs to get the files in synch instead of fixing the causes? The one cause we found this week generated at least 40% of the out-of-balance conditions I found Monday night (by query), and with lots of help OGS has been searched and an Incident Number has been established and we're looking for a fix from SSA shortly. Our re-orgs over the past 6 months have locked in place incorrect balances for at least 200 item numbers (found so far) and we have fixed 25 more that got generated during May. Correcting those is going to take a lot of work. Dick -----Original Message----- From: MacWheel99@aol.com [mailto:MacWheel99@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 10:11 AM To: BPCS-L@midrange.com Subject: Re: Erroneous Balances in ILI/IWI From Al Macintyre BPCS 405 CD on OS/400 V4R3 > From: LACELLE@rcmint.ca (Lacelle, Marc) writing about some problems Dick Bailey had encountered > Problem 3: Reorg programs. Yes you are correct in saying that the > ILI and IWI are not identical. You will need to run INV970 and INV972 (IN > THIS ORDER) right after month end. Please note (I MEAN RIGHT AFTER MONTH > END). Don't ever run this at any other time. > > I hope this helps > > Marc Lacelle Regarding your point about INV970 & INV972 in that order & only right after month end, I ask that you review WHY this should never be run at any other time, and should they always be joined at the hip. Was the suggestion to run INV970 then INV972 with respect to Dick Bailey's problem, or should INV972 always be run after we do INV970 & what are the consequences if we do not? How about running INV972 without INV970 in the picture - is that a problem? We have INV970 on our EOM menu as an optional step & often many months go between runs. We do it when people responsible for inventory management remember to complain to accounting, rather than MIS which has very little clout with accounting, when they need to have locations with zero inventory cleared off their reports & inquiries. This should not be run in a month in which we are doing physical inventory & it is extremely helpful if it is done the month before a physical inventory. I also think it is a generally good thing to get rid of locations with no recent activity to help overall system access performance. Our reorg menu includes INV971 then INV972 ... which I run normally about once a week, but also when I get a complaint from users that we have data out of sync such as the upper right corner of INV300 not adding up right, or negative allocations. Al Macintyre ©¿© http://www.cen-elec.com MIS Manager Programmer & Computer Janitor +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +--- +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.