|
midrange.com
Given all that SSA is going through, we have made a decision to move to 6.1
ASAP just to make sure we have a good clean version of BPCS. At least
there won't be the support issues if SSA negotiations fall flat.
"Smith, Graham
(EBM)" To: "'BPCS-L@midrange.com'"
<BPCS-L@midrange.com>
<Graham_SmithEBM@he cc:
inz.co.uk> Subject: RE: BPCS
6.02/6.04/6.1
Sent by:
owner-bpcs-l@midran
ge.com
05/03/00 10:40 AM
Please respond to
BPCS-L
Best reason for option 2 is that V6.1 is proving to be a lot more stable
than v604 and obviously better than v6.002.
From what I can gather whilst V61 was in development it gained BMR fixes
from V6.004 resulting in a better released product.
Graham
> ----------
> From: Handal, David[SMTP:david.handal@omgi.com]
> Sent: 03 May 2000 14:55
> To: 'BPCS-L@midrange.com'
> Subject: BPCS 6.02/6.04/6.1
>
> We currently have two facilities on BPCS 6.02, three facilities on 6.04,
> and
> two facilities will go live in 2-3 months (currently piloting 6.04).
> Given
> the problems with 6.02, we are looking at two options:
>
> (1) upgrade the 6.02 facilities to 6.04, and keep everyone on 6.04 for a
> couple of years, then go to a newer version (if BPCS is still viable
> then).
> (2) upgrade everyone to 6.1 starting with the 6.02 facilities this year,
> and
> upgrade the rest to 6.1 next year.
>
> Our modifications to BPCS are mostly reports; few inquiry screens; and
> minor
> interfaces to three other systems... We want to have everyone on the
> same
> version (for obvious reasons). Option 1 is more appealing because
effort
> is significantly less...
>
> Can anyone please provide information as to why we should go through all
> the
> trouble now to go with option 2 ...
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rob [SMTP:stagis@fansteelvrwesson.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 8:00 AM
> > To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
> > Cc: 'Hydro, Bill Wagner'; billw71@hotmail.com
> > Subject: RE: Events at SSA
> >
> > We're also on 4.05CD as well as running 6.1 at two other plants.
> > Personally, I don't use SSA tech support at all at the 4.05 plants.
> We're
> > content with the product - anything it's missing from my company's
point
> > of
> > view we simply code. I've got no reverence for maintaining teh virgin
> > code
> > in BPCS. We DO keep up the prescribed method of doing additions (user-
> > and
> > user-file libraries), and our installation is mostly 'stock' with the
> > exception of forms-changes. Mostly what we've done has been additional
> > reporting and we're satisfied with the product.
> >
> > I've got my permanent key, the system is stable and known to the users
> and
> > the MIS staff (all 2 of us) and we won't be changing in the short-term
> > future.
> >
> > The shops on 6.1? A slightly different story - this was a new
> > installation,
> > thankyouverymuch. Due to problems and DP personnel abandoning ship
> during
> > what was seen as a 'hopeless' conversion, I was sent in as the cavalry
> > along
> > with an outside consultant and we went live on our Y2K-necessitated
> > conversion on Thanksgiving weekend, 1999, whether they were ready or
> not.
> > They've got a plain-vanilla package that we're currently coding
> additional
> > reports for, and they're on the phone to SSA techies constantly. These
> > shops could have issues if there's problems with response, etc...and I
> > might
> > have problems if management deems it necessary for my shops to go to
6.1
> > in
> > order to be the same as the other shops.
> >
> > There's always consultants/SSA partners, and these guys won't be going
> out
> > of business anytime soon. They ARE expensive (picture me dodging
> bullets
> > from consulting companies here) but when you've got the right one,
> they're
> > much more responsive than SSA as well as just as knowledgeable, without
> > having the 'reverence' for the product that SSA promotes...they're
> willing
> > to see what it'll do when you don't use it according to SSA's master
> plan.
> >
> > For us? As a stable company, BPCS meets our needs.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com]On
> > Behalf Of Bandit Motorsports Inc.
> > Sent: Monday, May 03, 1999 10:22 PM
> > To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
> > Subject: Events at SSA
> >
> >
> > I've been ready the posts from this group for the past 6 months. It's a
> > great learning tool to read everyone's issues and replies. Thanks!!
> >
> > We are on 4.05 CD. With the recent melt down at SSA, I'm not sure, how
> > much life this product will have at my company. Managment's patience is
> > running very thin. Havn't seen much written on the subject here. Will
> > people in the group please share their thoughts on the subject?
> >
> > Thanks. George.
> > +---
> > | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
> > | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
> > | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> > | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
> > +---
> >
> > +---
> > | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
> > | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
> > | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> > | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
> > +---
> +---
> | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
> +---
>
**********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential and solely
for the use of the intended recipient. They may contain
material protected by legal professional or other privilege.
If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible
for delivering to the intended recipient, you are not authorised
to and must not disclose, copy, distribute or retain this email
or its attachments. Although this email and its attachments
are believed to be free of any virus or other defect, it is the
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free
and no responsibility is accepted by the company for any
loss or damage arising from receipt or use thereof.
**********************************************************************
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
