|
The ela problem occurred thru a modded program.where-by users can enter orders..accept order and it it processed all way...IE...invoice produced...(picked/confirmed/invoiced)....but if it 'FAILS'..and hinuse is reset...auto-billing pgm...re-allocated it... producing duplicate ELA record...it should not occur in normal circumstance. -----Original Message----- From: MacWheel99@aol.com <MacWheel99@aol.com> To: BPCS-L@midrange.com <BPCS-L@midrange.com> Date: 01 April 2000 21:51 Subject: Re: ITH transactions of the type # There are additional scenarios in which we might want to add something to ITH history or something similar to some other history that is not as busy ... there are changes to cost that do not get into any history that we see ... Last year we had a previous level cost in one item that was more money than the entire gross money of our corporation since founded in 1953, and now we have some previous level costs that are negative 0.0001 - we clean them up then more arrive - we need some kind of trigger notification of where they are coming from. if you look at a CST600 audit trail it is pages & pages of identical story ... I would like something that for the 1 line in 100 pages that is a change to the standard history, write like # with comment that CST600 changed standard cost here Our CST900 is 25,000 pages of detail in which the vast majority is within some reasonable norma, then boom, if we have not gone blind wading through it first, here is an actual cost change that is obviously totally bogus ... we want some way of getting right to the bogus information without wading thru thousands of Ok entries. > From: bpcsmaynez@yahoo.com (Jesus Maynez) > > Has someone solved the interrogant of why these > duplicated sequence numbers are generated?. I called > SSA once about this problem and they told me nobody > report that issue before. Now, I see I'm not the only > one who has the problem. Do they happen at sites that have not done any modifications adding stuff to ITH? When it happened to us, it was because we had added a program to add a new kind of transaction to the history to help better illuminate certain scenarios on the INV300 history & well I am not as good a programmer as I thought I was ... I made a mistake ... then when we did the testing, we were not as good as we thought we were there & we did not catch it ... then when we went live we discovered my mistake but it was too late, so I wrote another program to fix the numbers, and fixed the original mistake for the next time that program ran. That kind of scenario needs to be eliminated from the equation. Incidentally, we did not report that to SSA help support because we recognized very rapidly that the data was screwed up due to one of our own modifications. > From: tony@jackocsi.karoo.co.uk (Tony Jackson) > > I have seen this problem occur in three ways. > a:..duplicate ela record caused a pick confirm to write mulipltle records > taking tseq above 99,999. > b:..to much history causing tseq to go over 99,999 records. > c:..a canned month-end on inventory. Thanks - I now plan to do a query against ITSEQ in IIM sorting so biggest # on top & display it ... first screen should show largest # of any of our items so I can see if we are at risk of B ... but how do we deal with the ELA risk other than what we now do with a weekly reorg of it? Al Macintyre ©¿© http://www.cen-elec.com MIS Manager Programmer & Computer Janitor +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +--- +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.