|
To all and I apologize for the length of this email but it takes space to explain what is wrong & what's been done: We are running ver.6.0.02plf, c/s, Mar'98 cum on an AS/400 model S20 with dual processors, V4R4M0, & all the latest cum, database, hiper, y2k, performance tools, & client access ptf's. As part of our "day end" process, I bring down IP as a means of keeping people from being logged on while I do a backup of the system & BPCSF data library. Since going from V4R2M0 to V4R4M0 this last weekend, I have been having trouble with my production machine. I was baby sitting it last night & was able to determine that when I shut down TCP/IP, the NEWI daemons "peg" both processors & the IP shut down takes about 1 hour and 45 minutes to end. Looking at the job log, all I see is a blank time gap from 23:16:57 to 00:57:23 when nothing is logged. When I start my "day end", I change the job attributes to LOG(4 00 *SECLVL) LOGCLPGM(*YES). What I did last night after seeing the processors peg was to WRKACTJOB SBS(SUBSYSN) and kill the two NEWI jobs that had the system running at over 100% utilized. As soon as I did that, the rest of my day end process continued normally. Is there a "better way" to stop all the daemons running? These same programs (BPCS & "day end" ) run on my test box (a single processor 720) running the same software & ptf levels & it woks just fine. Obviously, there is a difference someplace - but where. I wrote all these programs about 2 ½ years ago when we first started with BPCS & IP. Being a novice to both at the time, the way I chose to do it was stop IP. But I also stop the BPCS subsystem. We do have a major VB application that gets at the BPCS data & the only way I have to lock them out is to bring down IP. Searching through OGS, the only reference I found to NEWI/OMS was BMR 45731 which doesn't really apply to my current problem but is something I also have a problem with. It was reported on 6.0.02 & fixed for 6.0.04 & 6.1 - no mention of a fix for 6.0.02. I filed a HelpLine incident & now I wait for them to respond. I'm tired of waiting & am looking for some input from others in the BPCS community as to their possible solutions/questions/comments, etc. I also logged an incident with IBM & after working with them for a couple of hours yesterday, I was told to call my ERP vendor. According to all the logs we looked at, IP was doing what it was supposed to be without any errors. Thanks - Dennis "One never notices what has been done; one can only see what remains to be done." -- Marie Curie "I love deadlines. I especially like the whooshing sound they make as they go flying by." Dilbert's Words Of Wisdom: Dennis Munro Badger Mining Corporation dmunro@badgerminingcorp.com <mailto:dmunro@badgerminingcorp.com> (920) 361-2388 +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.