× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: ITH transactions of the type #
  • From: gmihajlo@xxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 16:23:17 -0600

Rick,
I don't intend to convince you to forget about initial idea of avoiding these
records, but 8% of some half million records should not affect significantly
performance in your case. I don't see your box model, CPU and memory size, but I
wouldn't consider file of such size being potential significant performance
factor at all, unless something else requires attention on your AS/400 box.
A performance analysis might point whether you can resolve perfomance part of
this issue in some other way.
Regards,
Goran





"Warren, Rick" <RWarren@burco.com> on 03/24/2000 03:40:24 PM

Please respond to BPCS-L@midrange.com

To:   "'BPCS-L@midrange.com'" <BPCS-L@midrange.com>
cc:    (bcc: Goran Mihajlovic/SSA/US)
Subject:  RE: ITH transactions of the type #



The "#" records represent approximately 8% of the records in our ITH file.
We were looking at ways to improve query/ SQL performance against this file
and removing the "#" transactions would eliminate 50,000 records from our
searches.

We are keeping 360 days of history in the ITH which represents approximately
0.55 million records.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Holstein [mailto:holstein13@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 2:30 PM
To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
Subject: Re: ITH transactions of the type #


Hi Rick,

I think a better idea would be to set the TSTAT field to "Y" for all # and C

transactions.  That way, they won't be on the ITHL09 logical which drives
the CEA post and you won't have to delete anything from ITH.

I would do that monthly.

--Paul Holstein
iWork Software

----Original Message Follows----
From: "Warren, Rick" <RWarren@burco.com>
Reply-To: BPCS-L@midrange.com
To: "'BPCS-L@midrange.com'" <BPCS-L@midrange.com>
Subject: ITH transactions of the type #
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:51:38 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from [192.160.127.93] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
MHotMailBAA4E39200CAD820F3B0C0A07F5D0F280; Fri Mar 24 08:32:22 2000
Received: (from uucp@localhost)by uucphost.mcs.net (8.9.3/8.8.8) with UUCP
id KAA81152;Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:30:37 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from majordom@localhost)by linux.midrange.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) id
JAA14623for bpcs-l-outgoing; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:01:04 -0600
Received: (from uucp@localhost)by linux.midrange.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with UUCP

id JAA14608for BPCS-L@midrange.com; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:01:01 -0600
Received: from issmtp01.interpath.net (issmtp01.interpath.net
[216.48.1.21])by uucphost.mcs.net (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA70719for
<BPCS-L@midrange.com>; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 08:55:00 -0600 (CST)
Received: from comm_srv.burco.com ([216.48.36.253])          by
issmtp01.interpath.net (Netscape Messaging Server 3.61)           with ESMTP

id AAA26CD for <BPCS-L@midrange.com>;          Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:54:58
-0500
From bpcs-l-owner@uucphost.mcs.net Fri Mar 24 08:35:24 2000
Message-ID: <D1181630F1D1D011AFBB006097295BCF812EB6@COMM_SRV>
Sender: owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com
Precedence: bulk
X-List-Name: BPCS Users Mailing List (BPCS-L@midrange.com)


We are AS/400 6.02 MM on OS/400 V4R4.

We have looked at the description for the # transaction type and noticed it
says "Cost Adjustment from CST/ACP".  Our finance department ignores these
transactions when they post to the general ledger so we are wondering if we
could delete them from the ITH.

Does anyone know if deleting them would create any problems?
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---



+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.