Re: BPCS 6.1mm performance and the AS/400

["Genyphyr Novak" <novakg@xxxxxxxx>]

Well, I am sorry you had that experience. I have spoken to many other
clients who have had very good experiences with our current sizing guide.

As regards the BPCS programs being poorly written, I certainly hope you are
calling in BMRs to get the performance corrected, just as you would with any
other type of processing error.

Thanks

Genyphyr Novak
SSA
-----Original Message-----
From: Rosalie@omnia.co.za <Rosalie@omnia.co.za>
To: BPCS-L@midrange.com <BPCS-L@midrange.com>
Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 1:56 AM
Subject: Re: BPCS 6.1mm performance and the AS/400


>We did the sizing according to the BPCS sizing guide and it was a total
>waste of time.  Just about everyone in our user group who did the exercise
>also said it was a waste of time and that generally you have to double or
>triple the processing requirements that you think you might need.  Most of
>the performance issues are just poor programming/design principles (or lack
>thereof) e.g., a single spool file for each invoice - this is ridiculous
>and if any programmer working for me did this I would get rid of them very
>quickly!
>
>
>
>
>
>"Genyphyr Novak" <novakg@ssax.com> on 15/02/2000 07:30:28 PM
>
>Please respond to BPCS-L@midrange.com
>
>To:   BPCS-L@midrange.com
>cc:    (bcc: Rosalie Ducasse/ITS/Omnia Group)
>
>Subject:  Re: BPCS 6.1mm performance and the AS/400
>
>
>


+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---