Re: Y2K on BPCS 5.1

Manus:

The term slander is usually reserved to mean the spreading of falsehoods that
damage another's reputation.

I never mentioned MS4, or any other +/- 28 vendor in my comments so I don't see
why you should take this as a personal attack against you, your company or your
software.  By the sound of it, your product is a +/- 28 solution which you feel
has done well in the marketplace.  Congratulations.

Nonetheless, I stand by my criticisms as facts, rather than falsehoods in my
"damning" attack on +/- 28.

I would be glad to dismantle your rebuttle to my comments, point-by-point,
showing once again that date field expansion is the technically superior
solution that is as, or more economical than +/- 28.  However, I am not sure
that the BPCS-L user group is interested in suffering through ranting banter
between two vendors.  If anyone is interested in my views on MS4 or your
comments, I would give the subscribers of BPCS-L the option to receive such
feedback by making it known through the forum.



---------------------- snip --------------------------

>From Manus Bray at Millenuim Group:


Following a slanderous and damming email from Mr. Dan Mitchell, President
and CTO of Nexgen regarding encapsulation (+/-28), I would like to point
out some real facts.
          .
          .
          .
---------------------- snip --------------------------


+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---