|
> From: kcthai@nemic.co.jp (kcthai) > My company is planning to use BPCS ver 6.1 as our ERP system. Our > existing > system uses shop number to trace the whole manufacturing process. > > i.e. 1. Receive order from customer > 2. create a new shop for that order > 3. Kitting material for the shop > 4. load the production line for the shop > 5.Trace the work in progress of the shop > 6. Create invoice and shipping memo for the shop. > > I want to know whether BPCS cover this type of manufacturing process ? [Al Macintyre] We get the same work done with BPCS 405 but the process is a bit different. There are Customer Orders, Shop Orders, Purchase Orders, Planning Orders Also check out the contemporary thread RE: (no subject) & the recent thread on conversion from BPCS/36, for warnings about what can happen if you do not plan carefully to do it right from the start, which includes proper education in what you are doing. BPCS runs well when it is managed well by people who understand their BPCS jobs. > i.e. 1. Receive order from customer > 2. create a new shop for that order We create a CUSTOMER ORDER - this is the requirements that drive MRP & from MRP we can launch SHOP ORDERS and PURCHASE ORDER requirements We are a make-to-order job shop, which means that customers are constantly calling in changes to orders they just gave us a few days ago. We use blanket orders heavily, in which we are making the same thing for the customer with different combinations of date due of what quantity. There are many ways we are able to track & correlate what was shipped to a customer when on an on-going requirement. One of our problems is the ability to track performance against the original requirements, when they get changed both when the customer alters requirements, and to correct shipping errors. > 3. Kitting material for the shop > 4. load the production line for the shop Our Shop Orders contain detailed what material is needed to produce the parts and what routing details are involved, and there are associated reports identifying what raw material that we might not have been able to order in time to meet the customer needs, and the impacts on capacity planning so as to efficiently run our production lines. We recently made some modifications to improve the speed at which sub-assemblies get re-united where needed at higher parent levels on the shop floor. This did not affect what BPCS is doing - it is merely "tailoring" appearance of the shop labor ticket. > 5.Trace the work in progress of the shop As labor & inventory is reported, there are inquiries to check on the status of our various sub-assemblies & where we are in the production. We have also added some modifications to enhance this picture. > 6. Create invoice and shipping memo for the shop. Shipping is off of the CUSTOMER ORDER using inventory that was produced by the SHOP ORDER but we do not use data collection & thus there can be a lag in reporting inventory production for customer requirements shipped out the same day & BPCS is able to handle this, driving inventory temporarily negative, until the production reporting catches up with the transactions associated with the merchandise going out the back door. There are documents that travel with the merchandise to the customer, and after the shipping function is completed, billing creates invoice & various receivables. Customer Order is relieved Shop Orders go away when no longer needed We have the whole cycle of MRP II / ERP with BPCS It works for us with Inventory accuracy in the high 90 percentile, but some steps are a bit cumbersome & I don't know how well it will work for BPCS customers that choose a different mixture of application modules than we selected. From: jaliberty@lozier.com > It does not. New numbers in every module -- order entry, invoicing, shop orders, etc. The order numbers are assigned by the system, within some rules that we can manipulate. Most orders have a provision for a reference field so that you can peg them back to customer purchase order or whatever to enhance our ability to track why we are making this & the progress on stuff when a customer calls to ask. From: dslessman@nationalelectrical.com (Dwight Slessman) From: gsagen@primesourcetech.com (George Sagen) Dwight & George said it well We have sometimes wanted to modify the point at which the numbers are issued so as to include some embedded digits associated with the warehouse in which the production is to be done, or the facility, or the user who launched it, to help group this stuff in various reports, but the inquiry filters are very powerful, as is query when generating home brew reports. From: Stjean@rcmint.ca (St.Jean, Pierre) I agree 100% with this advice on knowing what you are doing before you do it. Al Macintyre +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.