Re: Billing Invoice Process

[Ata510@xxxxxxx]

In a message dated 2/18/99 3:37:38 PM Central Standard Time,
walt.schaff@abbott.com writes:

> EIL IORD, ILINE, IINVN, ISEQ
>  RAR ARDPFX, ARDYR, ARDTYP, ARDOCN, ARWSID, RCOMP, RCUST, ARSORD
>  RAR ARODPX, ARODYR, ARODTP, RINVC, ARWSID, RCOMP
>  RAR RCURR, ARODPX, RINVC, ARODTP, ARODYR, RSEQ, RCOMP
>  RTX TXDOCN, TXCOMP, TXCUST, TXODPX, TXINVN, TXODTP, TXODYR
>  SIH IHODPX, SIINVN, IHODTP, IHODYR, SICOMP, SIORD
>  SIH IHDPFX, IHDOCN, IHDTYP, IHDYR, SICOMP, SIORD
>  SIL ILODPX, ILINVN, ILODTP, ILODYR, ILCOMP, ILORD, ILLINE
>  SIL ILDPFX, ILDOCN, ILDTYP, ILCOMP, ILORD, ILLINE

While these logicals can help the BIL500 process itself, they do not affect
the CEA500BN part of the process, which is what they were mentioning in the
original note. Also, when trying out logical files, do not randomly put new
logicals in place (there are many lists mysteriously floating around out
there) -- What works for 1 site may not work for another at all. Depending
upon how you are set up, a file that is very large for someone else may be
small at your site, because it is not used (such as a Notes file -- if you use
notes on orders all the time, it can be large, if the company does not use
notes, the file could be small and a logical over it would make no difference
in the run-time). 

Test the effect of each one seperately to see if it improves performance
before putting them all in -- whatever does not help is a hindrance. There are
also some BIL500 performance BMRs that were entered in the past month which
suggest logicals -- you should check into that too, but again those are not
for the CEA500 part of the job. 

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---