× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Overall BPCS performance
  • From: JLR@xxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 09:03:56 -0400




We were in the same boat when we had a 530.  Some days, we would have over
100 jobs waiting to run to post the orders.  We are at 6.0.2 at January Cum
Plus.  We ended up moving to a 640.  This has resolved the problem to a
point, we still experience slow days when month end is coming.  I believe
IBM makes a 400 that can handle BPCS, it is just BPCS needs to fix their
programs to run efficiently.

Joe Royer


+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.