|
Vince Rowe writes: Here's our sad tale: 2+ years ago we started to implement BPCS 5.x.x on a nice little 310 AS/400. Of course we had to move to 6.x.x, and over the years we've landed on 6.0.2 PLF mixed mode March Cum. Over a year ago we actually got COM to function and discovered to our dismay that a one line order took 20 minutes to confirm with no one else on the box. Well, the cure was a 510 w/ 728M of memory and 60G of DASD. We're supposed to go live in 3 weeks and decided to do a stress test w/ 10 CS people or so doing order entry at 3 sites and a few others (trying) to do various tasks that would ordinarily be required to run a business. Back to the 20 minute scenerio w/ COM timing out on two out of three tries; simple GreenScreen Material Status lookups took minutes; forget getting anything to print; and the box was pegged for an hour *after* we completed our 1 hour test, finishing up some 65 left over jobs..........When we got the 510, it was the biggest box IBM made. My question is: can IBM make a machine that is up to the punishment BPCS hands out? Yes, we've had tuning specialist here and our BPCS consultants have remarked that our machine is the fastest responding they've ever used. You are not alone. Vince Rowe vrowe@odyssey.net Marietta Corporation Cortland, NY +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +--- ------ Message Header Follows ------ Received: from aries.wise.net by daemon.msmail1.wise.net (PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9h for Windows NT(tm)) id AA-1998Oct07.203620.1656.723761; Wed, 07 Oct 1998 20:36:21 -0700 Received: from Kitten.mcs.com by aries.wise.net with SMTP (XT-PP) with ESMTP; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 20:32:53 -0600 Received: from uucphost.mcs.net (Uucp1.mcs.net [192.160.127.93]) by Kitten.mcs.com (8.8.7/8.8.2) with ESMTP id VAA04094; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 21:32:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by uucphost.mcs.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA02802; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 21:32:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by midrange.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id VAA04667 for bpcs-l-outgoing; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 21:15:17 -0500 Message-Id: <199810080201.WAA11489@zeus.odyssey.net> X-Sender: vrowe@mail.odyssey.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.2 Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1998 22:01:43 -0400 To: BPCS-L@midrange.com From: Vince Rowe <vrowe@zeus.odyssey.net> Subject: Re: Overall BPCS performance In-Reply-To: <003501bdf24c$06ea5a20$a11e4d0c@default> Sender: owner-bpcs-l@midrange.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: BPCS-L@midrange.com X-List-Name: BPCS Users Mailing List (BPCS-L@midrange.com) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.