× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: Module source naming schemes
  • From: Joel Fritz <JFritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:03:07 -0800

Hah, that's too sensible. <g>  One problem with a prefix that denotes source
type is finding the source you want to edit after you've been using the
prefix naming convention for a while.  We have (artifacts of a previous shop
standard) at least 50 programs in production whose names begin with "CL."  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Buck Calabro [mailto:buck.calabro@aptissoftware.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 7:16 AM
> To: RPG400-L@midrange.com
> Subject: RE: Module source naming schemes
> 
> 
> Brad Stone wrote:
> 
> >For module source, I call them F.xxxx (F=Function?  I don't remember)
> >For prototype source I call them P.xxxx (p = Prototype)
> >For binder language, same as the module (F.xxxx) but in 
> QSRVSRC with the
> >P.xxxx
> >
> >This lets me easily subset all modules/service programs.  
> 
> This is a good thread.  Here's my opinion.  I never liked 
> Hungarian notation
> - artificially adding the object type to it's name takes up 
> space better
> used for... the name.  I'd rather split them along source 
> file lines instead
> of fiddling with the name.
> 
> Here is one scheme I've used:
> QRPGLESRC SOCKET holds all socket PI code:
>   sockOpen, sockRead, etc.
> QPROTOSRC SOCKET holds all socket PR code:
>   sockOpen, sockRead, etc.
> QSRVSRC SOCKET holds all binder source:
>   STRPGMEXP PGMLVL(*CURRENT) SIGNATURE(' 1.00 11 Sep 00') 
>     EXPORT SYMBOL(sockOpen)                               
>     EXPORT SYMBOL(sockRead)                               
>     etc...
>   ENDPGMEXP                                               
> 
> Since all the members have the same name, maintenance and 
> compilation are
> trivial.  I have not found a simple way of answering the 
> question "Where is
> my socket read() function?"  I currently use PDM to scan 
> QPROTOSRC (because
> the function may not currently be public.)
> 
> If I were the only programmer, I would write a Code or SEU 
> macro to create
> and log every PR in order to build a library of functions.
> 
+---
| This is the RPG/400 Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to RPG400-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to RPG400-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to RPG400-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.