Re: Correct CIDR for two networks. -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Correct CIDR for two networks.
From: Patrik Schindler <poc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:59:45 +0200
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello John,

Am 19.04.2024 um 17:29 schrieb John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx>:

Then you are trying to combine two Class B networks, which would mean your CIDR would have to be somewhere between /9 and /15.

Just to make you aware: Tying the size of networks to a "class" for knowing its size has been abandoned for decades. Forget the term "class x network". :-)

:wq! PoC

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Correct CIDR for two networks. , John Yeung

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.