Correct CIDR for two networks. -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Correct CIDR for two networks.
From: Jim Oberholtzer <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 09:30:21 -0500
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I seem to have a mind block. I need the correct netmask/cidr for two
networks to combine.
172.29.100.x
172.29.101.x

I'm using /22 (255.255.252.0) but that does not seem to be correct.

Thoughts?

--
Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Correct CIDR for two networks. , John Yeung
Re: Correct CIDR for two networks. , Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis
Re: Correct CIDR for two networks. , Patrik Schindler
RE: Correct CIDR for two networks. , Rich Marion

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.