× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. February 2017

Re: Storing source as DDL instead of DDS

We are doing the same, works great.


On 02/24/2017 03:27 PM, Rob Berendt wrote:
My thoughts on this.

Doing a wholesale migration from DDS to DDL has some benefits but I am not
certain it would be the best use of your companies money at this time.
Doing all new development using DDL instead of DDS is a reasonable
approach.

Since you would be supporting a mixed environment one option would be to
put the DDL into the same QDDSSRC pf. While this may drive a purist mad I
believe it would make the transition for a new employee the easiest.
Hopefully, they would look for the DDS for the file, find the source
member and quickly realize that it's in DDL and they need to switch gears.
If they can't figure that out, you've made a hiring mistake.


Rob Berendt


-- Este e-mail fue enviado desde el Mail Server del diario ABC Color -- -- Verificado por Anti-Virus Corporativo Symantec --

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.