I thought the theory behind having mirrored DNS servers and disk drives was
that you could fall back to one if the other were to fail. Well, a nice
theory ;-)

Since the statistical probability of both instances failing together is
just about NIL, I suppose that means that in your case both instances rely
on some external dependency - which failed?

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Steinmetz, Paul <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

I know this should be on a different post, but wanted to share this.

1) Early this morning, scheduled Windows updates took much longer than
expected, both DNS servers were down at the same time, no DNS, results not
2) Early this afternoon, scheduled reboot of IVR for Windows update, both
mirrored hard drives failed on reboot, results also not good.

Can't wait till the day is over.

Thank You
Paul Steinmetz
IBM i Systems Administrator

Pencor Services, Inc.
462 Delaware Ave
Palmerton Pa 18071

610-826-9117 work
610-826-9188 fax
610-349-0913 cell
610-377-6012 home


This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2015 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact