72 Drives is no issue and 1/3 of them can be SSD. You WILL want to use
5887 Drawers with this card as they are the only 6Gb SAS drawers
available. The 5802 is 3G and also you can't get to 72 drives with that
drawer either as you end up with only 9 drives per port of the 5913
rather than 24 with the 5887.
Discussing with with some IBMers at COMMON (I think) they indicated that
in testing they went way past 24 SSDs to see when the card would 'run
out of gas' and even with two drawers full they didn't slow down.
Remember IBM usually tests a fair bit past the announced 'supported
maximums' to be sure there are no issues.
I would have no issue running 24 SSDs and an additional 48 'Spinny'
disks on a pair of 5913s.
- Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis
On 10/22/2013 11:39 AM, Mitchell, Dana wrote:
We are configuring a new machine for our development environment. The first proposal included 30 139Gb drives behind a pair of 5913's. Is that too many drives for a pair of these cards? Wasn't the ROT in the past about 22-24 drives per pair of cache cards, or are these that much better performing?
BTW, I tried to search the midrange-l archives and I get a page that says:
For those of us who just can't get enough
Move along ...Move along ...
... nothing to see here.
Try Geeky Ramblings instead.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Attention: This electronic document and associated attachments (if any) may contain confidential information of the sender (SHAZAM Network) and is intended solely for use by the addressee(s). Review by unintended individuals is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient: (i) do not read, transmit, copy, disclose, store, or utilize this communication in any manner; (ii) please reply to the sender immediately, state that you received it in error and permanently delete this message and any attachment(s) from your computer and destroy the material in its entirety if in hard copy format. If you are the intended recipient, please use discretion in any email reply to ensure that you do not send confidential information as we cannot secure it through this medium. By responding to us through internet e-mail, you agree to hold SHAZAM, Inc. and all affiliated companies harmless for any unintentional dissemination of information contained in your message. Thank you. (2)