× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I am using uncapped processors. Typically I set the maximum for both processing units and virtual processors to the maximum a specific partition will ever use. My Business Partner set up a system with the maximum for both processing units and virtual processors as the total processors on the entire frame. Is one way better than the other? Does it matter what the Maximum number is as long as it is greater than the Assigned number?

For example this system has 20 processors for the entire frame:

SYSTEM A:

Processing Units
Minimum: 0.5
Assigned: 5.0
Maximum: 20.0

Virtual Processors
Minimum: 1.0
Assigned: 6.0
Maximum: 20.0

It seems my Business Partner does the same thing with memory. Making the maximum number for each partition the maximum for the entire frame:

SYSTEM A:

Dedicated: 10GB
Assigned: 100GB
Maximum: 400GB

Becky Bakutis
Systems Engineer
Republic Services

480.627.2760 (w)
bbakutis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.