USE sets the current database - on the i, a library is the same thing as
what MySQL and others call a database.
There is a SET OPTION DFTRDBCOL schema-name that gets you the same thing.
Or you can set naming convention in JDBC to SQL and set the default
collection there.
I think!
HTH
Vern
On 2/1/2013 5:04 PM, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
Scott, I hope you're feeling better; don't push yourself on my account.
I'm sure anybody familiar with both MySQL and DB2/400 can answer this,
whether they know JDBCR4 or not.
At any rate, it's like the subject line says.
I haven't really had a good opportunity to install MySQL someplace with
a fixed IP address, and so I'm running the first tests of JDBCR4
pointing right back to the local DB2/400 on the very same box.
I changed a copy of the JDBCTEST source member, so that it goes into the
local DB2/400 (talk about carrying coals to Newcastle!) instead of a
MySQL server. I successfully got rid of the parameters on the CREATE
DATABASE that DB2/400 didn't like, and it successfully created the
TESTSCK library, with all the extra baggage of an SQL collection.
Then it tried a USE statement. Which is perfectly fine in MySQL, but
DB2/400 didn't like it. And while a quick RTFM confirmed that DB2/400
doesn't have a USE statement, I haven't a clue what the equivalent would be.
--
JHHL
