We are recommending to all our customers to be running RAID5 with Hot Spare since disk drives are so cheap now. All my IBM I servers are also running Raid5 with not spare.
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 1:48 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: RAID 6 versus RAID 5; your experience with RAID6?
We're using RAID 5 with no hot spare. We have monitoring software in case, (scratch that) for when a disk fails. As soon as I get that message I am supposed to call IBM (if they didn't call me first). And replace the drive ASAP; weekend, night, prime time - no difference.
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1 Group Dekko Dept 1600 Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
Kendallville, IN 46755
From: "Eric Lehti" <elehti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date: 01/04/2013 01:42 PM
Subject: RAID 6 versus RAID 5; your experience with RAID6?
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Any of your systems configured for RAID 6 protection?
Noticed any discernible performance decrease with RAID 6 compared to
what you had with RAID 5?
Or do you just use RAID 5 on yours?
We configured our high-availability POWER 7 8202 for RAID 6.
I am considering possibility of RAID 6 on our production POWER 7 8202.
Currently it is RAID 5.
Search term RAID at