MIDRANGE dot COM Mailing List Archive



Home » MIDRANGE-L » January 2013

Re: RAID 6 versus RAID 5; your experience with RAID6?



fixed

On 1/4/2013 12:41 PM, Eric Lehti wrote:
I am considering possibility of RAID 6 on our production POWER 7 8202.
Currently it is RAID 5.

Consider carefully. Testing shows for workloads that are approximately 65% READ (so 35% write), you need approximately 20% more disk units than if RAID5 was used to achieve similar disk response times with all drives working. If your workload is similar to most customers, you are probably 65% (or more) WRITES, and then more even drives would be needed.

Beauty of RAID6 is no performance penalty when a single drive has failed. No noticeable impact after the failed drive has been replaced and rebuild is occurring either.

Changing from RAID5 to RAID6 requires ending parity protection and restarting it. (Don't forget to backup before starting this!) The type of disk controller, disk unit size, and number of drives per controller (or pair of controllers) determine how long it will take. Feature 5805 IOAs with 24 139G drives might take 6-6.5 hours to start RAID6.







Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2014 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact