Allowing an unqualified service program name was added in a PTF back in
early 2009.

5.4: SI34268
6.1: SI34794

Yes. It worked for me on our v7 box AND our v5r4 box, but then failed on
client's v5r4 box. Must be a PTF difference?

Sue Romano
IBM i database development

Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2015 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact