and a requirement for stronger administration skills.
is a major reason why I discourage it for those shops that only do this
once ever 7-10 years.
You really have to know what you are doing. It's not a simple matter of
taking MYPGMLIB, MYDTALIB from your V5R4 machine, restoring it on your
machine and calling it a day. There's so much configuration stored inVerify
both 'traditional' libraries and now in stream files outside of the
/qsys.lib file system.
There's been a few occasions on this list where people have done this
wrong and are still trying to clean up the mess months later.
-- IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1 Group Dekko Dept
1600 Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive Garrett, IN 46738 Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E Kendallville, IN 46755 http://www.dekko.com From: Jim
Oberholtzer <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Midrange Systems
Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Date: 11/01/2012 07:58
AM Subject: Re: V5r4 Upgrade Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
If the ability to "re-implement" your software, meaning move it from
an older box to a new box presents itself, I will most often make that
choice for the very reasons Kirk points out. You can really clean up a
system. Also. you now have the ability to move custom work management,
communications, and configuration objects into a library of your
choice not QGPL, or QUSRSYS. You leave old objects no longer needed
behind. Once the new box has the OS loaded, user profiles,
communications, work management set up, ect. without the applications
and data on it, you can take a base back up. Take this opportunity to
create your own install media. Now if you ever rebuild the system use
your own install media and most of that will be preset for you! Really
neat if you need to build additional LPARs! There are real advantages
to the what Kirk suggests if you stop and think of them. The downside,
more work initially and a requirement for stronger administration
skills. The payoff in the end is much higher than the cost in my
experience. Jim Oberholtzer Chief Technical Architect Agile Technology
Architects On 10/31/2012 5:07 PM, Kirk Goins wrote:
Plan, Plan and More Planning as the others have basically said.
won'tyour Vendors that their apps are 7.1 compliant and run the Anzobjcnv
process until it is clean or you completely understand what will or
convert to 7.1 and if it won't, can you abandon that program/app or
need to replace / upgrade it either before or just after the
Upgrading the Old system to 7.1 has its risks, but they are
needsLeaving the 5.4 box alone and moving everything to the 7.1 also
careful plan and care so you don't down level OS objects in places
'movingQGPL, QUSRSYS etec as well as the IFS. 2 advantages I see of
Housethings' to the new box and not up grading. #1 Great time to Clean
leave crap behind you don't need any more. #2 You be able to get to
21 toshorterpoint of refreshing your data files to go live, This should be much
downtime in theory than Upgrade to 7.1 and then later Save/Restore
loadedWaters<bwaters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:move the the new box.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Billy
> We are in the planning stage of migrating from V5r4 to V7.x
to arelated to
> new server. Is anyone willing to share their time line
"cutover" over> this process? My boss is under the impression we can do this
> the weekend without any prior testing on the new server /
--> advance for your assistance.
> Billy Waters
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2015 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact