MIDRANGE dot COM Mailing List Archive



Home » MIDRANGE-L » November 2012

Re: V5r4 Upgrade



fixed

Rob,

Yeah, didn't realize IBM had a published migration now :)

As far as #2, as I read the OP...he has a v5r4 machine and the new 7.1
machine...so there's no reason not to test...granted would be a bit
difficult to test his apps on 7.1 prior to upgrading the v5r4 machine...but
certainly if he's going to go direct from v5r4 to 7.1 he should be able to
test the process.

Charles

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:03 AM, <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I agree with you Charles. But...

1 - If IBM publishes the 'migration' at

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v7r1m0/topic/rzamc/rzamc1.htm
then that must be another officially supported path also.

2 - Not everyone has multi lpar or multi box environments to test.
Granted, this person will have a new system which could be an ideal test
environment. Perhaps we don't know all the details, like is the new
system really functional without taking some critical hardware out of the
old one and putting it into the new one?


Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1
Group Dekko
Dept 1600
Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com







Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2014 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact