I had the impression that the OP wanted this in reverse RRN sequence.
SQL would not be a very efficient way to do that (though, I guess it
could work.) I thought record-level access would be better for this
sort of thing.
If you really want to see my code, it's here:
There are probably 100 ways it could be improved, but I don't plan to
actually use it.
Keep in mind that (as I've already said) I don't think this is a good
technique, and I don't really recommend anyone do anything this way. (I
can't say that enough.)
On 9/11/2012 11:13 AM, Stone, Joel wrote:
So share how you did this - SQL? APIs?
Hey - someday we may ALL have to take this test to keep our position
that was recently outsourced to an off-shore outfit.