× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Thanks Chris, and thanks for the 'field level update' explanation. I like that.

- Michael

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Chris Bipes <chris.bipes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Remote journaling is the MY preferred method as it is still be supported
and enhanced by IBM.

Trigger with local data queue to post changes and program on remote end
reading a TCP/IP DDM Remote data queue is my second choice.

I also like to perform what I call field level updates.

Chain to local file with lock for update.  Compare before and after
value of field, if changed, compare before and current value of field.
If the same, change current to after value, if not, log the three values
into an audit / error file and skip update of that field. Update record.

Rinse and repeat for each field in the file.

Of course a delete is just that a keyed delete, no reason to read the
local file. And an insert is just a write to the file.

--
Chris Bipes
Director of Information Services
CrossCheck, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Ryan
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 5:49 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Replication Opinions

Great replies folks...thanks very much. I need to replicate the
changes on a near real-time basis, so a once a day file transfer won't
work for me. I've written code in the past to handle updates with the
remote journaling, so I may resurrect that code and modify it to fit
the current needs. MQ is licensed to one of the systems but not the
other, so that's probably not going to help. The budget is probably
just person hours - no room for package software.

What are folks thoughts about the continuing use of DDM? I just seem
to shy away from it anymore. I know it's still viable in a TCP/IP
environment, but I find it's not my first thought when it comes to
remote file access. I'd rather have some SQL code embedded in my
program that processes a remote connect and accesses the data that
way. Of course, that's not a good option when needing to access both
remote data and local data.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.