|
Richard already indicated his reasons for continuing to maintain source members in the traditional library-file system. In addition to his reasons, we use a tool that generates CL scripts from database meta data. We have another tool that interpretively runs the scripts and generates Web applications plus related configurations. We also use the RUNSQLSTM command against SQL source members. We're using more tools than just ILE compilers, in summary. We're a long shot from being ready to use the IFS alone for source. I'm interested in using Subversion, and it appears that several others are interested too. So that raises interest in an interface with the traditional IBM i file system.
I wouldn't be interested in a kludgey system either. Regarding the effort that it might take to put one together, that may depend on mutual collaboration. I couldn't predict what might come of that, but the discussion has opened my mind, at least.
My gut feel is that the wheels are turning in the minds of a number of participants here. Someone may be thinking that the job of synchronizing a repository with the library-file system won't be too big, because they've already done work on that. Someone else may be thinking that installing the AIX port under PASE might not be too hard. Someone else may be an expert on check-in, check-out procedures. Someone else on compare& merge procedures.
-Nathan.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.