|
Birgitta, We are in a discussion about Databases and DB2 on iSeries. Same old 'we are better then you' stuff etc.Can you tell me where you got this info that DB2 for iSeries would be 100% Standard SQL 2003 ,
while other SQL implementations wouldn't reach 70%? thanks luc----- Original Message ----- From: "BirgittaHauser" <Hauser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 6:44 PM Subject: AW: Creating dds source from SQL Tables
But for DB2 UDB for iSeries / System i statistics are gathered, indexes areout-balanced, space for the tables is reseverd and maintained, but all is done automatically. BTW DB2 UDB for iSeries / System i under Release V5R4 is the only database that covers the latest SQL-Standard SQL-2003 to 100%. Oracle for exampleeven with its latest version only covers around 70% and all other databasesless.In this way other database must have a lot of non-standard features, either.How else interested parties could be convinced to prefer this database or any other. In this way why should our database not be a "standard" database? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards Birgitta Hauser "Shoot for the moon, even if you miss, you'll land among the stars." (Les Brown) "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance." (Derek Bok)"What is worse than training your staff and losing them? Not training themand keeping them!"
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.