I remember being able to log on remotely to another state agency's
system as QSECOFR QSECOFR not too many years ago. They thought they
could achieve security through obscurity until I pointed out how
vulnerable they were.
AGlauser@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Jim Franz wrote on 03/11/2006 03:40:02 PM:
I'm not trying to minimize the effect, put the percentages listed seemed
high and some may read this as a study of the whole community.
They don't seem all that high to me. I think that lots of systems have
problems with weak passwords, too many users with high authority, and
other security problems - whether they run a System i or some other box.
Just my two cents,
Adam
#####################################################################################
Attention:
The above message and/or attachment(s) is private and confidential and is intended
only for the people for which it is addressed. If you are not named in the address
fields, ignore the contents and delete all the material. Thank you. Have a nice day.
For more information on email virus scanning, security and content
management, please contact administrator@xxxxxxxxxxxx
#####################################################################################
