RE: application programming. the microsoft vs ibm approach. -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: application programming. the microsoft vs ibm approach.
From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:54:07 -0500
Importance: Normal
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

> From: Steve Richter
> 
> ILE has been the IBM version of the .NET MSIL/CLR.  It allows modules
> written in different languages to be combined in an application.  Is
that
> still the case going forward?  Does IBM plan to enhance ILE so that
the
> following snippet from the above link can also describe what ILE does?

This is exactly what ILE does, and they did it long before Microsoft,
Steve.

CLR is Microsoft's version of ILE.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.