|
Hello,
we currently have several big projects that use ODBC - and we had lots and
lots of performance problems.
Not so much on the AS/400, but on the application running on the pc
server.. Very simple SQL-statements and
only 2 or 3 files on the AS/400 that were used (and all less than 20.000
records).
We are now switching to OLE-DB, which, on the first try, seems to be 5
times faster than ODBC. Updates that
took about 200ms through ODBC where done in about 40ms with OLE-DB. I know
that isn't accurate, just some
stopwatch checking, but factor 5 (for minimal program changes) seems to be
promising.
We will be running some more in-depth test in the near future..
Regards,
Oliver
"g man" <g.man2000@lycos.com>
Sent by: To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion"
midrange-l-bounces+oliver.wenzel=cibavision.novartis.com@m <midrange-l@midrange.com>
idrange.com cc:
Subject: ODBC Perfomance issue
28.01.03 19:07
Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
I am working with a 'legacy' type application that interfaces a VB
application (using ODBC) with an AS/400 system file with a trigger on it to
process the data to update yet another set of files.
The problem being experienced is a huge performance hit on the AS/400 - I
had heard that ODBC was slow but bringing the system to it's knees is
another issue.
Is there any tuning I could investigate to make this more efficient..or is
there a way to direct the VB job as it signs on to the 400 to a separate
subsystem or some such..
I'd appreciate the help..
Girish
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.