|
> From: Mark Phippard (snipping a LOT of excellent points - please go back and read Mark's post if you missed it) > The iSeries rocks when it comes > to unscheduled downtime, but it is not so great in the area of planned > downtime. This is one of those times when I can only agree and shake my head, because I have no good answer. While not quite as bleak to me as a developer, I still agree that the PTF process is slowly declining. Whether this correlates to the comparative explosion of functionality we've seen over the last 5 to 10 years, or is simply an artifact of internal processes at IBM (or as is likely, a bit of both), the final outcome is that it is indeed more difficult to keep an iSeries up for that magical 99.99% uptime. Heck, depending no your environment, you might be hard pressed these days to keep the machine up 99% of the time (88 hours scheduled downtime per year). On the other hand, though, applying the latest group PTF on V5R1 (which including HIPERs, database, WebSphere, HTTP) required no intermediate IPLs, so maybe there's hope yet. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.