Mark, We can do this now. You setup independant storage pools, and you can move them from one system to another. so if you have a system ASP, and everything else in other ASPs 1-n you can vary one off and vary it onto another box. It works best with SHARK I think, but was beening demoed at the Nashville Common last year. So, at least in theory. If you have two systems capable of handling the workload, you could move all the user area's (storage) to system two and them update system one with ~zero user down time. JMS... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Phippard" <MarkP@softlanding.com> To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 8:35 PM Subject: RE: Joe's V5R1 upgrade > > As Walden and others have pointed out, with a cluster of Linux or Windows > systems you can take a system out of the cluster to apply fixes without > bringing down the cluster and your application. > > I think the iSeries really needs to improve in this area. As it stands, I > would have a real hard time recommending the iSeries for someone with high > availability needs in a "connected world". The iSeries rocks when it comes > to unscheduled downtime, but it is not so great in the area of planned > downtime.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2015 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact